Feedback and corrections

Help a lifelong learning academy improve

Original texts, pronunciation, translations, commentary, interpretations and tool boundaries all need ongoing review. Share specific issues and suggestions to improve the classical library and Five Arts tools.

Text and commentary issues

A missing character, pronunciation error or unclear translation in a chapter of the Great Learning.

For classical-text review

Interaction and layout issues

An obscured chapter button on mobile or a tool result overflowing horizontally.

For web and mobile usability review

Potentially harmful content

An overly absolute destiny interpretation or a formula description missing a medical-care caution.

For safety review

Long-term improvements

A suggestion for passage notes, a learning path or a reflection workflow.

For product consideration

How feedback is handled

Record, classify, address and document

Sustained maintenance needs evidence, triage, review and records. Clear details help maintainers turn feedback into actionable work.

Record the evidence

Record the issue, page, source text, device and impact so details are not lost.

Classify the report

Classify reports as text, usability, safety, feature suggestions or other feedback.

Address the issue

Maintainers assess editions, reproduction steps, risk and product needs, with further review when needed.

Keep a record

Record the handling process for maintenance review and personal feedback history.

Protect the source text

Prioritize missing or incorrect text and ordering. Source editions, textual review and an audit trail support the library.

Clarify interpretation

Review pronunciation, translation, notes and interpretation separately, keeping the explanation clear without flattening its meaning.

Use the Five Arts with care

The Five Arts are for cultural learning and reflection, not frightening predictions or substitutes for professional judgment.

Return to everyday practice

Use knowledge to develop character, act responsibly and care for others, not merely to seek novelty.

Before you submit

Make your feedback verifiable

Did you name the page or book and chapter?

Help maintainers locate the issue without guessing.

Did you include the wording, a screenshot description or steps?

Evidence makes review and repair easier.

Did you distinguish factual errors from interpretation?

Interpretations can be discussed; textual errors and faulty behavior need evidence.

Did you explain the impact on learning, reflection or safety?

Issues affecting the quality of long-term learning are prioritized.